Skip to main content

2015 Paris Climate Accord

On December 12, 2015, the world did something remarkable. Nearly 200 nations across the seven continents came to an accord. In Le Bourget, France, the event now known as the Paris agreement was birthed. From Kiribati to Kampala, there was a loud cheer for a collective victory. Even though it fell short of what some hoped, to address the climate question of our time, it nonetheless set a tone for engagement and positive action and an indication, business as usual, would not continue.


 Key components of the Paris accord as contained in article 2 are;

  • to ensure global average temperature remains below 2.0 C(3.6F) above pre-industrial times and work towards more ambitious cuts of 1.5C(2.7F) above pre-industrial times
  • deploy measures to live with the present effects of climate change while adapting mechanism and measures going forward that are eco-friendly, climate resilient and which does not sacrifice food sufficiency
  • provide financial support to back the adoption of green technology and climate adaptive developments


The Paris Climate accord is perhaps the most important action leaders of the world have taken, collectively, since the end of the two great wars. In the aftermath of the accord, however, critics lashed at the eventual level of compliance, citing the lack of a thoroughly binding testament to hold nations to their promises. 

The Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) a non-obligatory instrument adopted by the parties at the Paris negotiation to facilitate the transit to a better future does not go far enough to tackle the enormous issues and also differs from nation to nation in terms of achievements and goals. While some countries such as Sweden have set an ambitious pathway, intending to stop the sale of fossil fueled vehicles by 2030, the US, one of the largest global polluters have already signified interest to pull out from the whole agreement. 

Snippets🔼✔
They exist a possibility albeit a slim one, that in future if we continue with the business-as-usual pathway; on fossil fuel addiction, clouds may disappear. This future without cloud was the result of modeling work done at Caltech, imagining a scenario where carbon dioxide hit three times the current levels in the atmosphere.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5G is not the Enemy

In 1895, a German physicist, William Roentgen, discovered something he could not explain while experimenting with electricity: rays capable of penetrating soft tissue. He promptly used this discovery to take an image of his wife's fingers, which showed her wedding band. She is said to have exclaimed, "I have seen my death."  This physicist had discovered X-rays, which today are indispensable in medical imaging.                                                       Roentgen first x-ray image The German physicist who discovered the X-rays found that they could penetrate various objects, including books. He named these rays "X" for unknown, and with the photography technology available at the time, he was able to create images by capturing the X-rays when they struck an object.  Light, which photographers use is also a part of the spectrum. ( the...
2 comments
Read more

Land Surface Temperature is NOT Air Temperature

Land Surface Temperature (LST) is a crucial metric in the discourse on global warming and climate change. However, LST is often taken out of context, leading to confusion and misinterpretation. Recently, the BBC reported on the Cerberus heat wave that swept across several European cities, and their report had an LST map from the Copernicus Sentinel imager. The map, with its ominous red hues, had Spain looking like Hades and folks on Twitter, quickly jumped on it offering different hot take on the matter. Twitter is a space where climate experts, deniers, believers, and non-experts alike congregate to discuss climate-related issues. Personal opinion abounds . Be warned! While maps are useful in visualizing data, they can also be misleading when taken out of context. For temperature maps, blue is typically associated with cooler temperatures, while red signifies hot or extreme temperatures. However, in reality, the electromagnetic spectrum has blue as a hotter color than red. ( Little ma...
Post a Comment
Read more